Talk:Hospental Castle

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hospental Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100628110559/http://www.bevoelkerungsschutz.admin.ch/internet/bs/de/home/themen/kgs/kgs_inventar/a-objekte.html to http://www.bevoelkerungsschutz.admin.ch/internet/bs/de/home/themen/kgs/kgs_inventar/a-objekte.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 19:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Jet Lag: The Game

This castle was featured in the online web series Jet Lag: The Game, in both Season 9 and Season 11. JLTG is a great show, and I quite enjoy it. However, it is not notable enough to warrant a mention on this page. No source has been provided that talks about this castle's appearance on JLTG. Someone keeps adding that information to this page, and I keep deleting it, because no source is provided. They also cite, without reference, that JLTG is the reason why most people outside of Switzerland know the castle, which is a dubious claim. I'm not trying to say that JLTG is bad or that it doesn't belong on Wikipedia, all I'm saying is that you should find a source before making your claims. Follow Wikipedia policy. --172.88.48.178 (talk) 03:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I believe Jet Lag: The Game deserves a long-term presence on this page, in a different form. I have updated my previous revision of the page, included better headings, formatting, more info and crucially, better references. I have not uploaded a reference for the castle's S11 appearance, I'll do so as soon as the video goes live on YouTube to better allow unbiased researching without subbing to Nebula. I'd appreciate any feedback, but please don't outright delete this info again. CallumC.Gurney (talk) 09:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

As well as this, the references I've provided have a URL error I'd like a second opinion on. There are no problems with formatting or an incorrect URL, but I get an error, no matter what. Any thoughts? Kind regards, Callum CallumC.Gurney (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

YouTube is a pretty poor source (see WP:RSPYT, WP:YOUTUBE, WP:UGC, and WP:SPS). That said, I think that in this particular case... it might be acceptable. I'm mostly okay with the way you've phrased it now. Though I would appreciate a third party weighing in on this. --172.88.48.178 (talk) 10:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)