Talk:Hot Dogma

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Grahamec in topic Merge proposal

Merge proposal

edit

I have moved the contents of Hot Dogma - The Interview Disc into this article, the interview disc article has had an orphan note since November 2006 and, now that its contents are in this article, can be merged into it.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done.--Grahame (talk) 11:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hot Dogma/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  N Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  •  N All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  Y At least one other section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  N A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  N A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
  •  N Independent in-line references supporting major/controversial claims

B class:

  •  N All the C class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  N A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  •  N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 12:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)