This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Unless there is some compelling reason, yet to be made clear in any of its content, this article should surely be merged in with Widnes. It shows no sign of being in any way Notable in its own right. Comments? DDStretch (talk)00:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm happy for this merger to take place. Sometimes suburbs and small localities benefit from their own articles (Sholver and Greenacres - both written by myself - come to mind). I don't think this is one of them. -- Jza84 · (talk)00:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply