Talk:House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. | |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080618013738/http://www.rferl.org/newsline/2002/07/5-NOT/not-260702.asp to http://www.rferl.org/newsline/2002/07/5-NOT/not-260702.asp/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090214010212/http://www.bulgaria-gateway.org/en/browser.php?state=content&id=500&type=article&lang=en&topic_id=1&cur_pos=%2F to http://www.bulgaria-gateway.org/en/browser.php?state=content&id=500&type=article&lang=en&topic_id=1&cur_pos=%2F
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Tsardom of Bulgaria
editWhile it is occasionally translated as "kingdom", the Bulgarian country only ever had one person to officially hold the title of king (https://bg.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%8F%D0%BD). Bulgaria is a country of Caesaropapal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesaropapism) heritage. Thus the title of Tsardom would be more appropriate as a Tsar is equivalent to an emperor not a king.(Sorry, I'm bad at editing. I'm also not sure what you would consider adequate citation as that information is mainly present in high-school textbooks.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.13.205.17 (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Grammar
editThe first two sentences of the article read as follows:
"The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha ... is a European royal house. It takes its name from its oldest domain, the Ernestine duchy of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, its members later sat on the thrones of Belgium, Bulgaria, Portugal, India, and the United Kingdom and its dominions."
The red comma (,) should be a period, followed by the start of a new sentence. 2601:200:C082:2EA0:4175:AB30:8B7C:6D98 (talk) 03:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
King of Australia
editThere was no separate title King of Australia until the Statute of Westminster was adopted by Australia in 1942. Grassynoel (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Continued Reign of in the UK?
editThe article’s second paragraph states that in the house’s reign ended in the UK upon the death of Elizabeth II.
However, according to House of Windsor: On 8 February 1960, some years after both the death of Queen Mary and the resignation of Churchill, the Queen confirmed that she and her children would continue to be known as the "House and Family of Windsor" In other words, Charles III is considered a continuation of this reign.
I guess it is complicated, because Elisabeth’s decree applied to the House of Windsor - which was how the British monarchy renamed their house in 1917 - and thus have no bearing on descendancy from the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha’s perspective.
On the surface there appears to be a discrepancy between the House of Windsor and House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha pages as to whether the reign continues with Charles III. Is it worth adding a comment to this page to clarify about the apparent discrepancy? A Carbine Flash (talk) 21:48, 24 May 2023 (UTC)