Talk:Household income in the United States

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Avatar317 in topic Broken reference

Former good articleHousehold income in the United States was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 7, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 20, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 15, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Old data

edit

This data is old. It is 2013 but many of the tables have the newest year as 2009. Get some new data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.196.198.36 (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I just updated the main table at the top of the page with the latest data. If you have newer data, please place a reference here and make the update yourself. Jcloudm (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I've resurrected this complaint and added the template. This data is incredibly outdated now, and is worth mentioning to casual viewers. Especially as the new census comes out, this needs to be updated badly. 160.39.16.142 (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

US territories

edit

Should this article be updated to include information about the Territories of the United States? TJMSmith (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Broken reference

edit

Reference 42 is no longer accessible via the link provided. Also, the way it's quoted in the article is strange. "…[a]verage earnings ranged from..." What does "[a]verage" imply about the formatting of the reference? I can't find the census.gov publication to figure this out, either.

I'm sure some other references are bound to 404 as well, given how old this article is. Should they just be kept up, as is?

Cheers. My apologies if this seems stupid but I'm genuinely curious about a better way to present this info. Juvanet (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

You're right, the wording is confusing (the last sentence is best, discussing increasing degrees and increasing earnings) but 2006 numbers are now outdated and could be replaced with the newest from the Census bureau. Feel free to update this, that would be appreciated. ---Avatar317(talk) 23:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply