Talk:Howard Altman

Accuracy

Mr Altman had compliments for the Wikipedia, and it's accuracy during my conversation with him. He suggested one modification (number of awards won) which I implimented in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SusanLarson (talk • contribs) 22:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Birthday

I spoke with Howard Altman and he declined to give out a more accurate birthday than the one listed in the article. He considers it a bit too personal. -- SusanLarson ^{(User Talk, New talk, Contribs)} 22:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

You'd need to provide a source other than your original research to include his birthday anyway. But in any case, according to guidelines at WP:BLP, we aren't supposed to include the exact birthdates of lesser-known celebs to help protect their privacy. Vivaldi (talk) 10:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Article about this page

See this link. Badagnani 06:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

The reuters article explains the real reason why Altman is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. At the moment, the impression you get from wikipedia is that he is notable because he won some awards. The real reason he ended up on wikipedia is because of his reporting on John Patrick Ennis aka Sollog. That should be made clear in the article.Arnold1 (talk) 01:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

That's the reason why "[HE] thinks" he got on Wikipedia, according to the article. He may have gotten known for his reporting on that specific subject but that's not necessarily the reason why he's on Wikipedia. But I agree it should be mentioned.

Altman ended up in Wikipedia because of his claim to fame six years ago for reporting on an American numerologist, John Patrick Ennis, thought to have predicted a large number of major events, including the 9/11 attacks. "I gained a following all over the world because of that ... I think that's why I got on Wikipedia," Altman, 47, said.

-- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 02:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Howard Altman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041204165116/http://citypaper.net/mediakit/awards.shtml to http://citypaper.net/mediakit/awards.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041112011529/http://philadelphiaweekly.com/view.php?id=7296 to http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/view.php?id=7296

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)