This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Controversial ?
editOr just boring ? -- Beardo 03:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
This article is a mess, run on sentences, weasel words, NPOV issues... Rhinoracer 09:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
What...?
edit(who was originally thought not happy with Velez giving the second Ghost Rider an origin, but has since revealed that he never read the Valez, Jr. stint as Ghost Rider's write and was told by his editors to write Ghost Rider into the issue in order to allow the character to be used in later issues)
Apart from the fact that this is an overly long parenthesis, uh... What does it say? Gaunt Man 20:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have flagged the article for a rewrite - some of it is fiendishly difficult to follow and, as you say, I am unclear what that even means. (Emperor (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC))