This page was proposed for deletion by K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) on 10 June 2017 with the comment: #REDIRECT List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (Schu–Sz) -- pls see Talk It was contested by Icewhiz (talk · contribs) on 2017-06-12 with the comment: Undid revision 784790061 by K.e.coffman (talk) significant ace. triple-ace in a day. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hubert Strassl article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
editDoes not meet WP:SOLDIER & significant RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions or non RS.
A recent MilHist RfC, which aimed to modify SOLDIER to cover those with ace status, concluded w/o arriving at a consensus that flying aces should be presumed to be notable. Here's the RfC in question: RfC on notability of flying aces.
No de.wiki article exists. Successful completion of missions is not part of SOLDIER. Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well reference in books. The RfC was on 5+ aces - and wasn't clear cut. Meets GNG and SOLDIER(4).Icewhiz (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)