Talk:Hugh of Lincoln

Lincoln Cathedral

I'll do some work on this page in a couple of weeks; just to say that I will be taking out the statement that Lincoln cathedral is the first gothic building in the country, a claim which no building can really make, and certainly not Lincoln. It is, however, prodigiously advanced in its style and most fine.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.241.108 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 17 November 2007

Appointment as Bishop of Lincoln

This article follows the Catholic Encyclopedia in dating St. Hugh's :) appointment as Bishop of Lincoln to 1181 after a vacancy of 16 years. All other sources I have found state that he was appointed in 1186 after the cathedral was struck by lightning. The Wikipedia list of Bishops of Lincoln gives Geoffrey Plantagenet as bishop from 1173 to 1183 and Walter de Coutances from 1183 to 1184, and this is confirmed by other web sites and the 1973 Encylcopedia Britannica.

The article also does not mention his conflicts with Richard and John. For example, according to other sources he was on his way to protest to Richard about his oppression of the church when he heard of Richard's death. Dudleymiles 13:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I've updated the appointment and consecration dates to follow The Handbook of British Chronology Ealdgyth | Talk 02:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

'English saint'

Linking to a category is always unpleasant, but it seemed much more on topic than just linking to English people and non-specific saint. Anyone have the time to start a list of English saints to match everyone else's? Just remember to exclude the ones from before 1066, since list of Anglo-Saxon saints has inexplicably already been done first. — LlywelynII 10:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

edit: Ok, so the Scots don't have their page either, yet. And the Americans and Australians do, but Canada's more modest (or less holy). — LlywelynII 10:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hugh of Lincoln. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511204752/http://www.saintshughandjoseph.churchgoers.co.uk/ to http://www.saintshughandjoseph.churchgoers.co.uk/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511204752/http://www.saintshughandjoseph.churchgoers.co.uk/ to http://www.saintshughandjoseph.churchgoers.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh of Lincoln. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120911004515/http://www.st-giles-church.org/fair.htm to http://www.st-giles-church.org/fair.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Neither an English nor French Holyman.

Seems to of been a Savoyard, Burgundian or somesuchlike, not French. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.40.85 (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Needs a Rewrite

I started editing this for grammar, pulled up short at the mention of a boarding school and soon found significant problems with the citations, starting with https://sthugh.org/, the website of a parish church, whose brief biography of St. Hugh mentions none of background it is supposed to justify.

Similarly, https://www.british-history.ac.uk/fasti-ecclesiae/1066-1300/vol3/pp1-5, is cited repeatedly, but contains only a few dates. Elsewhere on the same website, there is a substantial section on the Priory at Witham: https://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/som/vol2/pp123-128#fnn58, which contains some very interesting information about St. Hugh and seems to have been overlooked when this piece was researched.

On the other hand there are large pieces of Hugh's story that are given without any citations or quotes.

The 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica is an outdated (and in this case, rather fulsome) source, frozen in time. The 2019 Encyclopedia Britannica just "updated and corrected" its entry on St. Hugh. Things change.Merry medievalist (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)