Talk:Hugh of Saint-Cher

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 172.10.238.180 in topic Hugh and St. Louis IV

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 22:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hugh's correctorium

edit

I revised the earlier version which read: "He directed the first revision of the text of the Vulgate, begun in 1236 by the Dominicans; this first "correctorium," vigorously criticized by Roger Bacon, was revised in 1248 and in 1256, and forms the basis of the celebrated Correctorium Bibliae Sorbonicum." My reasons for doing so were that in the previous sentence, Hugh's correctorium and the decrees of the General Chapter of 1236, in which the "correctiones biblie senonenses" are mentioned, have been mingled. The "Correctorium Bibliae Sorbonicum", to my knowledge, has nothing to do with the decrees of 1236, but is yet another correctorium. Jclinde, 11 December 2009, 14:02

Hugh and St. Louis IV

edit

Jean de Joinville, in his "Life of St. Louis", relates Hugh's brief visit to the royal court, his address to the king, and affirms his status as a holy friar. This lively anecdote, in which Hugh lectures the saintly king and spurns an invitation to stay longer than a day at court, could be mentioned (and add some energy to this article, which currently reads a little drily). It would also be interesting to hear some of his purported miracles, if any references to them are extant.

Here is the reference to the visit to St. Louis: http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=legacy/uvaBook/tei/WedLord.xml&chunk.id=d28&toc.id=d28&brand=default .

172.10.238.180 (talk) 07:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply