Talk:Hugo Dittberner
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Randykitty in topic Contested deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis article should be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because an anonymous wiki contributor says so... (your reason here) --Charles01 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
I am in the middle of translating it from German wikipedia as you would have known if you had taken ten seconds to look.
Nominating an entry for speedy deletion within a few minutes of its commencement may be an effective way to reduce the time that people will devote to wikipedia, but seems unlikely to cure the mental issues of those that indulge in it.
I wish you a speedy recovery.
Regards
Charles01 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- I understand your frustration, but a hostile message like this doesn't help much either. To avoid an article being nominated for (speedy) deletion, it is better to work on it first in your sandbox and only when it has at least some sourcing establishing notability move it into main article space. Alternatively (even better), start with the sourcing... Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2014 (UTC)