Talk:Human ethology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Human ethology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2018 and 5 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fernandez103.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
No mention whatsoever
edithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Bach : This article has absolutely no mention of the con-artist who came up with this theory in the first place. So there is no way that this can be a neutral article without a reference to it's actual history. -- unsigned comment by 216.246.232.41 00:49, 7 November 2014
There is no need for ad hominem against scientists associated with the research tradition. Only referencing if specific theories or hypotheses have been proven or dis-proven should be in the purview of the article. -- 72.83.3.178 (talk) 09:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- This article has little or nothing to do with the person mentioned. I've removed the tag from the article. Sparkie82 (t•c) 18:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Sociobiology is a branch of evolutionary biology concerned with the evolution of social behavior. It is not concerned with mental states and therefore cannot be regarded as a 'psychological theory'. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.57.227.56 (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
References
Remove merge template
editThe 'merge' template suggests that this article be merged with Human behavior. However, I see no discussion of a merge on the talk page. I will vote no to merging because 'Human ethology' is a distinct research tradition and a likely search term. Agnerf (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Needs revision
editThis article has many unsourced claims. There should probably be more references to Eibesfeldt, who is often considered the initiator of this research tradition. It should also me mentioned that human ethology as a research tradition has now been largely succeeded by the closely related evolutionary psychology. Agnerf (talk) 13:21, 17 February 2019 (UTC)