Talk:Human red cell antigens
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThe footnote '1. ^ Blackwell Synergy - Cookie Absent' serves no purpose: the source can't be viewed (or verified), and my as well not exist. This reference should be removed.
- The joy of wikipedia is that if it's wrong, you can fix it. I have done so, it appears that that particular link is now dead, so I have axed it. SDY (talk) 02:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 20 August 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Human red cell antigens. Unopposed. Jenks24 (talk) 16:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Other red cell antigens → ? – I'm not sure what the new title of this article should be, but whatever it is should not start with the word "Other". Titles starting with the word "other" that are not the official title of the subject, such as this article, are confusing since it leaves the reader to ask "Other than which (insert subject here)". And also, this article has only 1 incoming link (not a heavily-linked title whose only incoming link can be replaced), so I also recommend that the leftover redirect from this title be deleted after the move. Steel1943 (talk) 03:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 23:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- Rename to Human red cell antigens and add WP:SUMMARYSTYLE summaries for the other topics that already have separate articles. As red blood is not solely a human topic, it should carry "human", since this does not cover non-human other antigens. Since we don't really write "other" articles, conversion of this to cover all human red cell antigens fixes that problem. Alternately Human non-blood-group red cell antigens, but I think that's too clumsy. -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The blood types and antibodies picture in this article is wrong!
editAs you'll see from any other picture online, Blood type A produces anti-B antibodies, not anti-A thank god. Same as with blood type B. 82.43.177.123 (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)