Talk:Human the Death Dance/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Human the Death Dance. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
ode to 2005?
didn't he release this song to the public because he wasn't going to put it on the album? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.113.15.57 (talk • contribs) 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- nope
- "Another song that Epitaph has suggested that I remove is the Ode to 2005 track. Not only because it's already been released online, but because it doesn't match up in terms of overall sound compared to the other songs. However, that was the first song I recorded for this album and all the other songs evolved OUT of it. It's sort of the mother song of the album, and I don't want to remove it. It anchors a nice mellow 3 song period of the album before the energy picks up for the final 3 songs. Not only that, but there's a Buddy Wakefield sample that appears on the end of it that applies to the song and perfectly transitions into the next. I gotta keep it." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.139.36 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
what he said... also, please sign your comments Febodyed 09:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
has not leaked
the article states that the album has leaked, yet it's not to be found anywhere on the internet, bit torrent or p2p. furthermore, most albums leak eventually and the fact that it has done so is not something worthy of mention in an encyclopedia.69.218.47.38 04:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ummm... Yea it has leaked. I just listened to it. Just because you don't have the greatest sources to find something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Where do you think the track titles and times came from? Also the date of the album leaking has been put into most entries recently. Again if you checked around you would know this. Djarum0 08:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- well it hasn't circulated. i went to all of the major BT trackers and searched soulseek for hours. i even tried googling the god damnned thing. yes it has leaked, but you are one of about 5 people to have it as it has not been widely circulated. "Also the date of the album leaking has been put into most entries recently" so if everyone in your neighborhood started raping women, it would automatically be ok? on several of the pages the leak date was deleted and in the talk page a note left about the fact that all albums leak and it's not worthy of encyclopedic mention.65.43.214.242 10:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- You sir are a moron and a coward. You are going on a website crying about how you can't find something, insulting others who do have it and generally being a pain. You really do not need to curse like a sailor when arguing it just shows that you lack the intelligence to hold a serious argument. I also think that ten years from now I may want to know when something leaked. Just because everyone dies does that also not make it worthy of a encyclopedic mention? On top of everything you do not sign your hate filled comments. I hope in the future you stay away from Wikipedia and the internet in general. Thank you. Djarum0 05:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dude.. take a fucking chill pill and stop being an asshole. what is your problem? i didn't insult anybody (you actually insulted me) and i didn't "curse like a sailor" i just stated that it isn't widely circulated. and i do sign my comments, that's why my IP address appears at the end of them. if i didn't sign them, it would say: "the previous comment was unsigned". i'm sorry, i never realized that the internet was such a big deal. way to get bent out of shape dude.65.43.223.41 07:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- There again you have wildly contradicted yourself. Someone calls you on your lies, you start using profanity and insulting them and then deny that you said anything of the sort. You need to mature a little bit before you come back here and learn how to talk and discuss subjects with other people in a clean and professional way.Djarum0 19:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dude what is your fucking problem? i never lied to anybody, i said that i couldn't find the album? is that a lie? did i really find it and i was just bullshitting people? i don't think so. and where is it that i insulted someone, please please tell me, because i'm dying to know what you consider an insult. for the record i stated that i couldn't find the album and then used a bad analogy... i don't know where in there you see lies and insults. maybe you need to put down the crack pipe and kindly remove the stick from your ass. i'm immature? you're the one who keeps trying to start shit with me. and furthermore, who cars if i say fuck shit piss? have you ever even heard a sage francis album? "cocks and cunts together at least" that's a direct quote, and you're bitching @ me for being profane? wtf? oh yeah and "I also think that ten years from now I may want to know when something leaked" really? why?68.255.185.73 16:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- There again you have wildly contradicted yourself. Someone calls you on your lies, you start using profanity and insulting them and then deny that you said anything of the sort. You need to mature a little bit before you come back here and learn how to talk and discuss subjects with other people in a clean and professional way.Djarum0 19:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dude.. take a fucking chill pill and stop being an asshole. what is your problem? i didn't insult anybody (you actually insulted me) and i didn't "curse like a sailor" i just stated that it isn't widely circulated. and i do sign my comments, that's why my IP address appears at the end of them. if i didn't sign them, it would say: "the previous comment was unsigned". i'm sorry, i never realized that the internet was such a big deal. way to get bent out of shape dude.65.43.223.41 07:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- You sir are a moron and a coward. You are going on a website crying about how you can't find something, insulting others who do have it and generally being a pain. You really do not need to curse like a sailor when arguing it just shows that you lack the intelligence to hold a serious argument. I also think that ten years from now I may want to know when something leaked. Just because everyone dies does that also not make it worthy of a encyclopedic mention? On top of everything you do not sign your hate filled comments. I hope in the future you stay away from Wikipedia and the internet in general. Thank you. Djarum0 05:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- well it hasn't circulated. i went to all of the major BT trackers and searched soulseek for hours. i even tried googling the god damnned thing. yes it has leaked, but you are one of about 5 people to have it as it has not been widely circulated. "Also the date of the album leaking has been put into most entries recently" so if everyone in your neighborhood started raping women, it would automatically be ok? on several of the pages the leak date was deleted and in the talk page a note left about the fact that all albums leak and it's not worthy of encyclopedic mention.65.43.214.242 10:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
There are many many more people than five that have a copy of this album. Whilst I don't really agree that an album leaking is necessarily encyclopedic, your raping women analogy is bullshit. Febodyed 10:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- most analogies are bullshit. i don't care. i was simply stating that just because everyone else does something, doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do. and i also didn't mean that only 5 people have it, i meant that a very small number of people have it. jesus christ, do you take everything literally?65.43.222.202 10:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Clearly you didn't mean exactly 5 people have it seeing as you said "one of about 5 people", however just because it is not available on any of the public BT trackers doesn't mean that a very small number of people have it. There are alot of analogies that actually make sense. I know what you were stating with it but it was unencessary. Febodyed 11:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Track Listing
The artwork posted on Sage's MySpace gives different track lists for the CD and LP versions, so I listed them like that here, even though the CD listing is different to that on the Epitaph website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Febodyed (talk • contribs) 01:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Somebody want to fix the track listing for the CD version? I assume that what's currently listed is the LP version, which is different from the CD release. I'd do it, but I'd probably mess it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.216.116.2 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
They're actually both the same, the artwork he posted up was wrong. Febodyed 21:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Human the Death Dance.jpg
Image:Human the Death Dance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:HumanTheDeathDance.jpg
Image:HumanTheDeathDance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
