Talk:Human trafficking in Kenya
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Kenyan English and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
CfSD
editPage was created in 2009, with tags created in 2008? I am assuming this is content that was deleted and is being recreated? -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 15:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oops! I am creating these from a template in my userspace (see here), which I made a long time ago (starting a second batch of these). Since they're PD it's easier that way to format them to get them included in at least a rough draft for now. The tags in my userspace got dated by the bot. I'll undate them. I've never posted this article before, and I doubt anyone else has either. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Alright. But I have a funny deja'vu feeling about this article, and I'm going to keep an eye on it. As of right now it severely biased and doesn't meet Wiki-Standards. I'm actually a little ashamed it's in the Main Namespace. Carry on. -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 15:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. Feel free to wikify and de-US-reportify it. You should be more ashamed that previously we had no article at all! I've made many of these before, so that may be your deja vu feeling. At least one (don't remember which) as AFD'd but kept, maybe unanimously, as being a worthwhile (but flawed, obviously) start to an article on an important topic. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Now I know where I've seen this info before... You're the Editor that posts all of these, I've had a disagreement with you before about these articles. You're an activist for something... and you create these articles in the name of it. I frown, only because you create a huge quantity of these articles, and get the information out there, but you sound not much better than a conspiracy theorist because of the quality of your articles. Might I suggest leaving all of these articles in your userspace until one is polished, then moving it to the mainspace. Finish one article completely instead of putting out so many half-completed articles.-- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 16:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not an activist for anything. Check out WP:LOCPROJ--I paste tons of PD content from everywhere. There is no rule that only completed articles can go into mainspace. Everyone here is a volunteer and can edit what they feel like editing. Someone later will probably take an interest in these and clean them up. See Wikipedia:Article development. They have appropriate tags to warn readers about their POV. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Human trafficking in Kenya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140924040742/http://www.regionalmms.org/fileadmin/content/rmms_publications/series_booklettwo.pdf to http://www.regionalmms.org/fileadmin/content/rmms_publications/series_booklettwo.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140924040742/http://www.regionalmms.org/fileadmin/content/rmms_publications/series_booklettwo.pdf to http://www.regionalmms.org/fileadmin/content/rmms_publications/series_booklettwo.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)