Talk:Human trafficking of North Korean women in China

Peer Review

The article is very well organized, it flows very smoothly and has a lot of good information about a topic that I did not think much about. I was also impressed by the quality of the sources and how most sentences are very well referenced. It was well proofread and written. It also does a good job of linking to other articles and having stuff linking to it. It has a good lead in section that addresses most of the article.

I suggest adding images, explaining just a couple more complicated words/sentences, and adding a little bit to the lead in about the types of trafficking. I think these small fixes will simply make the article that much more readable and accessible to readers because this is great stuff.

I think the most important thing to add would be adding images to illustrate the issue in the minds of the readers and follow more Wikipedia policy. Alecprofit (talk) 03:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review

I really liked how you structured the article, and how the title correctly reflects the content within! You found a good amount of reliable and interesting sources that support your topic really well, and I thought the addition of a history section was a great idea. I agree with Alec in how images could be added, but I understand how that can be difficult. Also don't forget to revisit the lead to fix the missing citation! Overall, I think your article does a good job on shining light on an issue in China that can be confused with other issues discussed in other articles. Ctrlxem (talk) 04:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Updates are welcome

This is a well-researched article. The topic has not been extensively written about elsewhere. I noticed that most citations here are before or around 2019 and added some 2023 information with reference #5. Hope to see more updates. Thank you. Path2space (talk) 03:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)