Talk:Human uses of animals/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Icebob99 (talk · contribs) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be doing the review. I'll list a section with any concerns that must be addressed, as well as a section with my optional suggestions.

GA criteria concerns

Nothing stands out.

Suggestions

• In the second sentence of the lead: animals provide much of the meat consumed by the human population? I can't think of any meat that doesn't come from animals; perhaps reword that.
• Article is of sufficiently broad coverage for GA status, but it is only 8kB readable prose, and I think 10kB is a good target to aim for. It certainly doesn't fail for my arbitrary preference, and it's more of an A class standard anyway, but expansion at this stage is always a good thing.

Checking against the criteria:

1. Well written: good layout, well-wikilinked
2. Verifiable: All the references check out and everything is referenced with inline citations (above GA standards)
3. Broad: Good broadness, doesn't go into needless detail. See optional suggestion about expansion.
4. Neutral: Good neutrality maintained.
5. Stable: edit history looks good.
6. Images: lot of them! Licensing looks good.

Good job on the article. I'm marking this as having officially passed. Congratulations! Icebob99 (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)