This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Philanthropy
editThis section was verbose, confusing, and read something like a promotional piece. I edited for clarity and conciseness.11 Arlington (talk) 05:42, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Spinoffs
editIs this section even necessary? Do any of the spinoffs even meet WP:NOTABILITY? It's an overwhelming piece that seems to add little substance to the article, and it seems like people are using it as a dumping ground for promoting their own spinoffs. 173.77.151.156 (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- I agree. None are notable and most are simply inspired by the original. Rwalkertalk 15:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Vidal Chastanet
editNot likely to be independently notable, but worth a mention in the larger article. No Matter How Dark (talk) 02:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Merge - I think a merge would be appropriate. I created it so somebody could merge or expand it. Thank you for bring it up! CookieMonster755 (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC) :-)
- Merge Obviously not notable enough for a standalone article, but could be mentioned here. --MelanieN (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Some people don't like this blog!
editThere's a very strong article argues about Humans of New York blog. Called The Problem With Humans of New York http://gawker.com/the-problem-with-humans-of-new-york-1617812880 . I think it worth looking at it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M7mood16 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Mp
editIt perfect Matt3fun (talk) 22:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)