 | Humfrey Gale has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editWas his promotion to Lieutenant General in 44 only brevet? Otherwise why the honorary promotion in 1947?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Added this to the text. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Humfrey Gale/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
edit3A Is there any way of finding out what the MC was awarded for ?--Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Not that I know of. The London Gazette records only the award. I checked the WO medal card but it contains no further information. His full personnel file is unavailable, as he served in WWII. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)