This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
More please
editThis article is currently rather frustrating for someone like me (not a Muslim, but interested in this topic). For example, the phrase "being within the limits of Islamic tolerance, and not going beyond the bounds of truth" (which is repeated very similarly on many websites) is not very useful: what are the limits of Islamic tolerance? I'm also a bit uncomfortable with "the bounds of truth", since that rather implies an Islamic POV (ie "Islam is true") and Wikipedia is not in the business of declaring any particular religious belief true (or indeed false). Loganberry (Talk) 01:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Amen to that! Wikipedians are not afraid to be NPOV with respect to the other major religions, so why be afraid to be NPOV with respect to articles on Islam? Wikipedia should not sanctify Islam any more than it should sanctify Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism or any other religion. Ericster08 (talk) 22:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The Qur'an discourages mocking Islam. How can it? As Islam as a religion did not exist before the Qur'an was written. Rather let this say, The Qur'an discourages religious humour. Nuttyskin (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Humour in Islam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123021436/http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/hadith_humor/hadith_laugh.html to http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/hadith_humor/hadith_laugh.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140123033445/http://zarch-1.webs.com/ruleofjoke.htm to http://zarch-1.webs.com/ruleofjoke.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123021436/http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/hadith_humor/hadith_laugh.html to http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/hadith_humor/hadith_laugh.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123021436/http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/hadith_humor/hadith_laugh.html to http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/hadith_humor/hadith_laugh.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140123033445/http://zarch-1.webs.com/ruleofjoke.htm to http://zarch-1.webs.com/ruleofjoke.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Humor
editI expected to read some jokes. Where is Nasruddin Hodja? 93.136.56.47 (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)