Talk:Humulene

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Errata

edit

Why is the BP quoted as 106C at 5mm of Hg? Why not at STP? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.213.61.35 (talk) 03:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

misc. problems

edit

In the introduction the word terpenoid should be deleted after "doubly substituted" (and a space added before "consisting"). In the biosynthesis diagram why are there arrows labelled b and why are there arrows in humulene? Why do references 7, 13, & 15 state "missing or empty"? 69.72.92.230 (talk) 02:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the bad grammar in the intro, removed the diagram which is problematic in several ways, and found the missing reference titles. Thanks for catching and reporting the problems, but in the future you should feel free to fix these kinds of errors yourself. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

addition of potential antiviral properties

edit

According to this scientific study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5206475/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.242.105.214 (talk) 23:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Humulene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply