This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
It's not wrong, although I'm not sure a stub is really useful. My understanding is that historians are not agreed on whether the Hunald of the 740s and the Hunald of the 760s are one and the same or two different people. I do not know whether one or two articles is better for the reader, but it's an editorial decision. In either case both opinions should be presented with the arguments for and against them. Srnec (talk) 14:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
