Talk:Hungarian Gold Train

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2001:8003:9446:5700:540F:27A9:4B02:9D7A in topic There was more than one 'Hungarian gold train'.

You Need To Be A Total Idiot To Believe This Nonsense

edit

Look at the dates. A german train running to Berlin in May of 1945.

  • I don't see why it's difficult to believe that a Hungarian Nazi/Fascist operated train attempted to smuggle loot out of an Allied controlled region during the end of WWII in Europe. That's exactly the time it makes sense. Besides, there are very reliable sources on all of this cited in the article. --Oakshade (talk) 02:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg

edit
 

Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg

edit
 

Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:15, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg

edit
 

Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg

edit
 

Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg

edit
 

Image:German WWII Frieght Train.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

were stored in a Salzburg Residenz

probably means the one Salzburg Residenz. then better: "wer stored in the ..." --Helium4 (talk) 08:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

That seems correct. Done. --Oakshade (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

There was more than one 'Hungarian gold train'.

edit

The article fails to mention that there was more than one train, and mixes up numerous details between at least 2 different trains.

The Hungarian National Bank train arrived in Spital am Pyrhn in January 1945. This train is well documented (eg by Zweig's book the Gold Train-but which also conflates two different trains), but the article fails to recognise this. My mother happend to be on this train, and said there were 950 people on board when it arrived in Spital. This was the train that was found in a tunnel in Spital, guarded by Hungarian guards, by the US in May 1945 in Spital, which was also the first investigated, and was the official train to transfer National Bank gold and various religious relics. The article conflates it with another Gold train that meandered through Hungary for several months in January to March-April 1945. The train that meandered for several months through Hungary before arriving in Austria in March-April 1945 was a different train, carrying 213 people, and transferred most of the stolen goods into Austria. The article fails to mention that there was more than one train, and mixes up numerous details between the 2 trains, including in the resulting investigations. One train was official, carrying state artifacts and emblems, but possibly also stolen goods, the other transferred the majority of stolen 'gold train' goods to Austria in March-April 1945. One of the reasons most of the Werfen train material was not transferred back to Hungary was because it contained official state items, and the Soviets were now in control after the war. The other train, which carried most of the stolen items, did not. The Hungarians wanted the National Bank train items placed in a bank in Switzerland, and not transferred back to Hungary, now under Soviet control, but the material, whether of Jewish origin or legitimate items of Hungarian National Bank origin, was all deemed stolen items, likely because it was impossible to separate the two. The material on this National Bank train was transferred to Frankfurt, some of which made it back ti Hungary. I have written to the author of the book-the Gold Train, upon most of which this Wiki article is based, with several details the author has omitted and badly conflated between at least 2 different trains. The author may have done this for legal reasons, because the legitimately transferred official National Bank items probably should not have been transferred back to Hungary under the official laws at the time. The author may have conflated 2 different trains-one official and one 'rogue'- in order to bolster the argument that the US and others, inlcuding the Hungarian State, acted more inappropriately than was always the case. The article needs revision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:9446:5700:540F:27A9:4B02:9D7A (talk) 07:08, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply