Talk:Hunter: The Reckoning (video game)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Alexandra IDV in topic GA Review
 | Hunter: The Reckoning (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 28, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hunter: The Reckoning (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Hunter: The Reckoning" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Problems with story.
editSome things in there never happened. Plus Carpenter was mad for the Hunters killing Hadrian, not the Warden. Unless the current story is what happened on the xbox. It would help if there was both storys posted so some cross-referencing can be done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bending Unit (talk • contribs) 19:57, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Two unrelated comments
edit- In the Xbox version, at least, I could've sworn the judge's name was Estaban. At the time I played the game, I didn't know that this was a real variant of Esteban, so I thought it was a hilarious error. The article gives it as Esteban, so maybe it was changed for the Gamecube version or something. Speaking of which,
- Why does the Gamecube cover claim it's only for Gamecube when Gamecube wasn't even the first platform it was released for? --BDD (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hunter: The Reckoning (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 00:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- "Single-player mode or multiplayer mode" -> "Single-player or multiplayer mode"
- Is there any information on the Uwe Boll film? I assume it was cancelled, any details on that aspect of the production?
- Nope, I cannot find anything after how they planned to shoot the film in British Columbia - I'm assuming it was quietly cancelled.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Screenshot rationale needs to be stronger
- Oops, this was uploaded by someone else, and I forgot to check the rationale when reworking the article. Fixed.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
That's about it @Alexandra IDV:. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 01:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Abryn: I believe I have addressed the issues you brought up.--Alexandra IDVtalk 02:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)