Talk:Hunter syndrome

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 98.194.39.86 in topic Weasel Words Throughout

Comments

edit

The article should define what "GAG" is. Joelthelion (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

A child with Hunter syndrome was central to this murder case. 217.33.74.20 12:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

There are more children with Hunter syndrome. His disability was not the cause of this "mercy killing". JFW | T@lk 15:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

The whole section about therapy seems to be taken from a Shire press release. I think it should be cut. 194.103.189.24 13:02, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the concept of moving the drug information over to the other article. However, I don't think we should just cut an entire section just becasue it mimics its source. As long as the information is valid and isn't a blatant advertisement, then it should stay. If it's a concern, we should rewrite that section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.12.179 (talk) 00:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the shpeal about Elaprase is extremely biased and should be re-written or cut. First, the "statistical significance" of the results are over-emphasized. The respiratory change in predicted forced vital capacity was not found to be statistically significant, and the 35m increase in distance walked over 6 minutes may be statistically significant but is debatably clinically significant. The hypersensitivity is underemphasized - while only 11 of 96 patients actually had severe infusion reactions, 51% developed the IgG antibodies, which correlate to a higher risk of a severe reaction (that statistic is hinted at, but not explained). Considering the high cost, high risk, and very limited benefit of this drug, it is difficult to imagine a third party wrote that section. 24.18.113.237 (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I highly agree about the Bias on Elaprase and a citation is needed.Sjbucaro (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)sjbucaro, Jan 10, 2012.Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hunter syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Weasel Words Throughout

edit

This article is poorly written and ambiguous to the point of being without value. Under the "Treatment" section, we read:

'Because of the very specific nature of the illness, treatment has been proven very difficult. The treatment for this disorder is specifically determined for each patient, because all cases are different.'

What does that even say? To me, it says it's impossible to treat because they can't define it. That's bad medicine in my book. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 12:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply