Talk:Huntington's disease in popular culture

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Chiswick Chap

Did some changes in TV section concerning "House M.D." The result of 13's test for Huntington's is a big spoiler and there's no warning here, so I reformulated the sentences hiding this spoiler.

Why is this not included with the Huntington's disease page? Does it really need its own page? comment added by Jowan2005 (talkcontribs) 04:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It used to be but attracted a lot of edits and outgrew its usefulness, so to include it we would have to reduce it in size - but then editors would once again start adding extra ones. It seems list are a prime target for not-so usefull information to be added. Moving to a separate page seemed to solve this at the time this is historical, what is best for the article / encyclopedia is the intended result so any fresh eyes n ideas are good. Lee∴V (talkcontribs) 20:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Those old comments remain pertinent. A list is usually not a desirable form for an encyclopedia article: certainly not here, where what is required is an analysis of the ways that the disease has been exploited in film and novel, with reliable secondary sources. The current list barely has primary sources, relying instead on bluelinks without explanation or discussion. The topic deserves much better coverage. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Huntington's disease in popular culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply