Talk:Huntly Ketchen

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Huntly Ketchen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330155427/http://www.gov.mb.ca/hansard/members/mla_bio_deceased.html to http://www.gov.mb.ca/hansard/members/mla_bio_deceased.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Huntly Ketchen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212001754/http://www.c-and-e-museum.org/chap3_e1.htm to http://www.c-and-e-museum.org/chap3_e1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Citation need raised (section Military Career)

I have raised a citation need against the sentence - which also identically appears in the article on Edwin Alderson - stating:

Both officers were supporters of Sam Hughes, who made it clear in no uncertain terms to the British Expeditionary Force's Commander-in-Chief, General Sir Douglas Haig, that if Turner was dismissed then the British Government could no longer rely on Canadian support.

This needs checking against what has been published on the political background of the crisis which led to Alderson's removal. In the Dictionary of Canadian Biography, the indication is that it was Sir Max Aitken - later Lord Beaverbrook, then Hughes-appointed Canadian government representative at BEF HQ, who directly communicated to Haig the political feelings about losing Turner and Ketchen. (Hughes was not at the front, which he did visit, at that point.) From at least one Beaverbrook biography, he clearly liked to credit himself with being instrumental in Alderson's removal. It is therefore questionable if Hughes actually made such a statement, whose tone would have verged on political blackmail, and whether it was referring to Canadian support to the BEF or to Britain's war effort as a whole. There is also an ambiguity in this sentence as it may not be clear whether the "who made it clear etc" refers to Hughes, or to the two generals (if they had said that, then in terms of military discipline it would have been an out-of-order speech for them to make to their immediate commander).Cloptonson (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)