Talk:Hurricane-proof building

---

Word Choice

In the section about windows being more securely attached than in typical construction, Tapcon is a trademarked brand of concrete screw rather than a type of screw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.83.138.211 (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Untitled

Hopefully, architects, builders, and engineers can contribute to the community of knowledge about building safer building.

Articles for Deletion debate

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash^talk 21:55, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Whaddaya mean other countries?

"... in that a building built before 1993 which may not be constructed to withstand wind loading can be... " What's so special about the year 1993? As far as I know, nothing significant happened to storms in 1993 (like, "god" didn't just decide all storms were going to be different...), so I suspect this is yet another case of someone not realising that there are in fact other countries on this planet outside the United States, and that these other countries in fact have their own legal framework... It's really fairly annoying. 95.209.191.97 (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Move

The correct grammar would be "hurricane-proof building". Jdorje 21:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Is it just me, or does the part about Monolithic Domes sound more like a sales pitch than an encyclopedic article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.207.251.174 (talk) 02:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 9 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus (non-admin closure) Fuortu (talk) 04:21, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

---

Hurricane-proof building → Hurricane building standards – I believe it would make more sense to rewrite towards an emphasis on building standards to expand topic to cover more regulations, industry practices. Shaded0 (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. — Andy W. (talk) 02:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• Comment the proposed title gets one hit in Google Books. (It would probably also be best to pick a title that doesn't look like it means "standards for building a hurricane"). I am not familiar with terminology in this area, but for example "hurricane resistance standards" gets 25 GBooks hits. 58.176.246.42 (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

• Comment Fair point, I was also struggling with the naming to avoid that.. I think Hurricane-area building standards may also be more appropriate. Shaded0 (talk) 16:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.