Talk:Hurricane Arlene (1963)

Hurricane Arlene (1963) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 22, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Reference issue

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Merge refs 5 and 13 with the info from ref 13. They are the same. Also, your references, in general, are not uniform, and are missing specific information such as publisher, publishing year, page number (Tucker book). This will need to be fixed. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Solved the problem with ref 4. Didn't realize those issues were caused by the List of wettest tropical cyclone page; sorry about that. They will need to be completely addressed before it tries for any kind of FAC run. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thankfully I'm not planning to go to FAC with this article Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's one of those issues that isn't dealt with effectively since list articles don't go through GAN. Even if they did, this reference issue wasn't an issue with my GAN runs between 2006-2008; the criteria must have gotten stricter. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Arlene (1963)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is close to passage. The refs are in working order, the article is well-referenced, and I've dealt with the few grammar issues. The article also appears to have all the sections/information that the TC project requires. Add the usual line about the name of Arlene not being retired, with an appropriate reference regarding its lack of retirement and the links to other Atlantic storms by that name which the project has written up within wikipedia, and I'll pass the article. Reviewer: Thegreatdr (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. I'm passing the article. Good job. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic