Talk:Hurricane Emily (1987)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mattisse in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Emily (1987) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | Hurricane Emily (1987) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
 | Hurricane Emily (1987) is part of the 1987 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Todo
editMore impact, pictures, references, better wiki links. Jdorje 04:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Emily (1987)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi, I have read through the article and find that it meets the good article criteria. I made a few copy editing changes which you are free to change if I erred.
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Well written
b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
- a (prose): Well written
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- a (references): Well referenced
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers major aspects b (focused): Remains focused
- a (major aspects): Covers major aspects
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass
Congratulations!
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Emily (1987)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Pretty close to B-Class, but the met. history could use some expansion and referencing. –Juliancolton | Talk 05:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 05:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)