Talk:Hurricane Flossie (2007)
![]() | Hurricane Flossie (2007) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Hurricane Flossie (2007) is part of the 2007 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Name recommendations
editI think it should remain Flossie (2007) unless a direct hit is expected with at least the eyewall crossing at least one of the islands (not in the forecast at this point, but in the cone of uncertainty). Should a direct hit come into play, it should be moved to Hurricane Flossie. CrazyC83 15:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- NO. Standard Wikipedia and Wikiproject naming guidelines should stay in place. Flossie is a reusable name and does not deserve the main article. – Chacor 15:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Chacor is right. It should only get the main article once retired. Of course, if it strikes the islands directly, the odds of it not being retired are pretty much nil. I would, however, be okay with redirecting Hurricane Flossie here if the storm does have a severe impact as none of the other Hurricane Flossies did much. —Cuiviénen 15:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I guess the policy changed since 2005...I just think it should be clarified now to make sure that no one does an unnecessary move. I like the redirect of the main article idea if it is likely going to be retired... CrazyC83 15:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unless it causes several billion in damage (which the 2005 storms did when they got the main article, and for the record I really hope it does not), I think it should stay at Flossie (2007), with the main article remaining where it is. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I guess the policy changed since 2005...I just think it should be clarified now to make sure that no one does an unnecessary move. I like the redirect of the main article idea if it is likely going to be retired... CrazyC83 15:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Chacor is right. It should only get the main article once retired. Of course, if it strikes the islands directly, the odds of it not being retired are pretty much nil. I would, however, be okay with redirecting Hurricane Flossie here if the storm does have a severe impact as none of the other Hurricane Flossies did much. —Cuiviénen 15:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Damage reports
editAny damage reports yet? Thankfully it did not affect the state as it was predicted to. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- PHFO will issue a post-storm report, as with any other NWS WFO. – Chacor 01:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Post season report is out. --Hurricanehink (talk) 05:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Followed by the NHC report. Jake52 My island 13:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Bot report : Found duplicate references !
editIn the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
- "Flossieadv20" :
- {{cite web|author=Powell|year=2007|title=Hurricane Flossie Discussion 21|publisher=Central Pacific Hurricane Center|accessdate=2007-08-13|url=http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/prod.php?file=/cphc/tcpages/archive/2007/TCDCP2.EP092007.21.0708132045}}
- {{cite web|author=Houston|year=2007|title=Hurricane Flossie Public Advisory Twenty|publisher=Central Pacific Hurricane Center|accessdate=2007-08-13|url=http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/prod.php?file=/cphc/tcpages/archive/2007/TCPCP2.EP092007.20.0708131447}}
DumZiBoT (talk) 04:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed. Thanks. Plasticup T/C 18:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Incomplete
editThe MH is incomplete. I'd lower it to stub, but it's well-cited and there's a good bit of impact. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- I was chatting with Cyclonebiskit about this on the IRC and he said that he forgot all about it. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home , User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Flossie (2007)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- "Hurricane Flossie brought squally weather and minimal damage to the Hawaiian Islands during August 2007" can you find something more intresting than this? Don't tell me that every EPAC article has this opener, because they don't. YE Pacific Hurricane
- It's fine as is. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- " After traversing the tropical Atlantic, the wave crossed Central America and entered the eastern Pacific on August 1." how is this important for the lead? YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Uhm...because it tells you what happened to the wave between the time it departed Africa and developed into a tropical depression in the eastern Pacific? It didn't magically poof from one basin to the other lol. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- You should mention it was slow to weaken at first, then mention the date its weakening accelerated. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure that's concluded from reading the MH. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Add more impact and preps to the lead. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Why don't you use the TWO archives for the origins? YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Why is it needed? The characteristics of the wave are already mentioned in the lede (poorly-defined) and we already know it moved off the coast of Africa and crossed Central America.
- Give a distance from BCS or Hawaii somewhere in the MH. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- ??? "At this time, the depression was situated roughly 1,700 mi (2,700 km) east-southeast of the Big Island of Hawaii." TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- "ensued as the storm entered the Central Pacific Hurricane Center's area of responsibility that morning" wikilink to CPHC and mention it corssed 140W as well. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Linked CPHC and AOR. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- "remained a Category 4 hurricane by 36 continuous hours.[1]" to "remained a Category 4 hurricane for 36 hours" . YE Pacific Hurricane
- "Heavy rainfall and flooding were expected to be the primary concern; as such, flash flood watches were issued and " wikilink to flash flood. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- " forcing a n estimated 26,000 college students to remain home." space issue here. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- "Elsewhere, 1 to 3 inches (25 to 76 mm) of precipitation fell at Maui, and 2 to 4 inches (51 to 100 mm) fell at the Koolau Range on Oahu, although no significant winds or flooding was reported." abbrivate units. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- "The most significant waves were estimated at 20 feet (6.1 m) in height, while sustained winds of at least 39 miles per hour (63 km/h) were reported at South Point. " same here. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Check for anything in List of Hawaii hurricanes for more info, in addition the below. YE Pacific Hurricane
- Nothing important. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Here for more info. YE Pacific Hurricane
- here may have some stuff as well. I'd mention Erick also passed south of the island in the start of the month. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:07, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- All information from that article has been used already. And Why? TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 23:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Add Hurricane Felicia (2009) and Hurricane Jimena (2003) to see also. YE Pacific Hurricane
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Flossie (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131112035732/http://www.kitv.com/weather/hurricanes/whats-closed-ahead-of-flossie/-/9327530/21216070/-/8m79wb/-/index.html to http://www.kitv.com/weather/hurricanes/whats-closed-ahead-of-flossie/-/9327530/21216070/-/8m79wb/-/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)