Talk:Hurricane Fred (2009)

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Hurricane Noah in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleHurricane Fred (2009) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
March 14, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 16, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Hurricane Fred, which formed and dissipated near Cape Verde earlier this month, was the strongest North Atlantic tropical cyclone on record to appear east of 35°W?
Current status: Delisted good article

About the Record

edit

"Just two storms, prior to Hurricane Fred, attained Category 3 intensity east of 35W...Hurricane Fred was the strongest of the three..." Enh, HURDAT lists the 1926 storm at 105 knots, equaling Fred's intensity. However, if you nitpick the wording, Fred was the strongest to form east of 35W as the 1926 storm, at least according to HURDAT, reached Cat 3 exactly at 35W. -- Watch For Storm Surge!§eb 15:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Intensity really goes by pressure and since the 1926 storm does not have a known pressure, Fred is technically stronger. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Landfall

edit

I think it is noteworthy that the remnants are about to make landfall on the carolinas. It's extremely unusual for the remnants of a storm to survive that long. There's still a broad surface low east of SC! If it does actually make landfall, or even if not, i think it's worth adding to the article (in impact section perhaps, its bringing rain to the carolinas.) -Winter123 (talk) 20:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It acturally made landfall as a weak trough late on September 23 then absorbed by a cold front on 24. HurricaneSpin Talk My contributions 19:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Fred (2009)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Leave Message, Yellow Evan home I saw a few minor errors that I fixed but otherwise looks decent. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tropical Storm Sebastien (1995) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 04:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hurricane Fred (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Fred (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:58, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Procedural delist. Noah, AATalk 17:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Consensus for a merge Noah, AATalk 17:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.