Talk:Hurricane Gordon (2006)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured articleHurricane Gordon (2006) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHurricane Gordon (2006) is part of the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 10, 2020.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 22, 2011Good article nomineeListed
June 9, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
June 27, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Fujiwhara

edit

IMO some mention of the Fujiwhara effect relative to Helene should be mentioned. I have no concrete links (was it mentioned in any of the tropical discussions?) but as the track of the storm pulled further and further south of the predictions it seemed pretty clear to me this was a result of a fujiwhara interaction, and furthermore that the NHC models don't account well for such interactions. — jdorje (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Azores

edit

|Azore Islands returns only 29,100. But |Azorean Islands returns 76,400. However, "Azores Islands" returns 6 million, and just "Azores" returns nearly 10 million. I say we should change the current name. RaNdOm26 16:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Look at it again - "Azorean Islands" - fully in quotes returns 11,600; "Azore Islands" - fully in quotes return 12,400. "Azores Islands" returns 36,000. – Chacor 16:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
To Azores....--Nilfanion (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just changed it to Azores, and Azores Islands. RaNdOm26 16:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
That works. – Chacor 16:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

10th since 1992?

edit

I was under the impression it was the 10th since records had been kept, with the last case of an impact in the Azores being in 1992. Can someone who knows the specifics check this? --Patteroast 12:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Gordon was the 10th hurricane to hit the Azores since records began in 1851. Before Gordon, 1992 was the last time it occured [1]. Pobbie Rarr 12:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Gordon (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk) 03:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • "Hurricane Gordon was the first hurricane to directly impact the Azores since 1992." - Re-word to "the first tropical cyclone", because neither Bonnie or Charley were at hurricane intensity when they impacted the Azores. Meaning that the next most recent hurricane to directly impact the Azores was likely Hurricane Emmy in 1976.
  • "The eighth tropical storm, third hurricane and first major hurricane of the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season," - Add a comma after "third hurricane"
  • "reaching its peak intensity of 120 mph (190 km/h)" - Watch the conversion, the infobox says (195 km/h).
  • "Further north, the storm brought warm air to Ireland and the United Kingdom, contributing to record warm temperatures in the latter country." - So all Gordon did in Ireland and the UK was bring warmer air into those countries?
    • No, but the impact was rather similar to Spain, and I thought record warm temperatures was a neat thing to mention in the lede. Also, you neglect to mention how the subsequent sentence mentions the 120,000 power outages in Northern Ireland. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:56, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "On September 12, the storm slowed down, the storm turned toward the north through a weakness in the subtropical ridge created by Florence." - This sentence doesn't read very well, mostly because "the storm" "the storm". BTW, it seems kinda redundant to use "the storm" more than once in a sentence; you could easily replaced "the storm" with "Gordon".
  • "during which eye decreased in size and the eyewall convection weakened." - Missing the word 'the' between "which" and "eye". Yesterday, I accidentally said to put the word 'the' between "eye" and "decreased".
  • I cannot finished the review now; I will complete it sometime tomorrow.--12george1 (talk) 03:47, 22 May 2011 (UTC) I have finished the review. BTW, I messed up when I wrote one of my issues (the one directly above).Reply
Part 2
  • Kind of a stupid question, but why is the section header "Storm history" and not "Meteorological history" like all of the other tropical cyclone articles?
  • "it is estimated Gordon intensified into a hurricane early on September 13." - Add the word 'that' between "estimated" and "Gordon".
  • "Gordon's resiliency presented a rare threat – the first since Hurricane Charley in 1992 – to the Azores," - It would actually be Hurricane Bonnie, not Charley. The former affected the Azores a few days after Charley did.
  • "Its motion became just south of due east, causing the strongest winds to remain south of the center." - This doesn't make any sense; because Gordon moved south of due east, its strongest were south of the center? I didn't think that the direction in which a tropical cyclone moves may cause it to become asymmetrical.
  • "The two westernmost islands were placed under a red alert," - What are the two westernmost islands of the Azores?
  • "The club's media center was briefly evacuated," - What Club? I didn't think that the Ryder Cup was a club. Did you mean the cup's media center?
  • On the NHC discussion references, with more than one author, it only shows the last names. Reference #4 says "Mainelli/Beven", but #15 says "Alex Morales and Margot Habiby".
  • There is a minor typo on the accessdates for references 4 and 5. The accessdates read "201-05-03"; while it is just simply a 1 missing, that is a difference of over 1,800 years. Imagine that, a Roman Emperor read those two pages.
  • On reference #12, the author is "Daniel Pasch"; either you meant to put Richard Pasch or Daniel Brown.
Ok, this seems good enough to pass. BTW, the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season is very close to being eligible for Featured Topic. The only thing in your way would be the List of storms in the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season. Congratulations, --12george1 (talk) 21:58, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hurricane Gordon (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Gordon (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply