Talk:Hurricane Karen (2001)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Karen (2001) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Hurricane Karen (2001) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis is definetly a B-class article, and probably pass through GAnom. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 19:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
GA Passed
editCongratulations on this articles promotion. Next might I suggest a Wikiproject assesment to see how it may be brought up to A-class and after a peer review? --Tarret 21:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Reassessment
editI think it is at A-class now. Any agreement? CrazyC83 02:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
editAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Karen (2001)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
The article needs a copyedit by a reader not familiar with the subject, to verify that it isn't too technical, and to check that there aren't any prose issues. Titoxd(?!?) 02:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 02:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 18:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Karen (2001). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051218140811/http://www.weather.bm/data/2001-10.html to http://www.weather.bm/data/2001-10.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)