This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under the "Preparations and impact" heading, there is this group of sentences; "Kay's outer bands also hit as north Southern California, southern Utah, and southwest Arizona, bringing wind gusts of near 100 mph (160 km/h) to many areas, though the highest winds recorded were in San Diego County, California.It had it affects On Riverside county. Rainfall totals varied across the regions, with Mt. Laguna recording the highest rainfall amount at almost 5.08 in (129 mm)."
What's the use of having, "It had it affects On Riverside county"? It doesn't add anything to the conversation, is incredibly ambiguous, and is poorly written. I'd strike it. LeviS999 (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Done This was added here[1], I would call this unnoticed vandalism. I have removed it. Thank you for your attention to detail. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)