Talk:Hurricane Klaus (1984)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Klaus (1984) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Hurricane Klaus (1984) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
 | Hurricane Klaus (1984) is part of the 1984 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Assessment
editHmm.
- Stability: Pass
- Well-written: Hold
- Broadness: Pass
- Factually Accurate: Pass
- Images: You sure there isn't one more of the storm?
- Neutral: Pass
Problems:
- "The Federal Emergency Management Agency provided an average relief fund of $2,128 (1984 USD, $4147 2006 USD) per affected person, the smallest return rate for a declared disaster in the Virgin Islands."-you missed a comma.
- You sure there ain't a writer for the Klaus TCR?
- Did you try the MWR for 1984?
For now, On Hold.Mitchazenia(8300+edits) 16:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I got the comma. The writer for the Klaus TCR is unknown. The MWR provides nothing more than the tropical cyclone report, and thus there is no need to use it. Images are not a requirement for GA's, so is there anything else needed to promote this to GA? Hurricanehink (talk) 17:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Pass then. good job Hink.Mitchazenia(8300+edits) 17:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
editAs part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Please keep importance high, unless you wish to engage in a discussion about it
editKlaus' name was retired from the hurricane list for its Caribbean impact, which should count for something. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:00, 24 November 2012 (UTC)