Talk:Hurricane Pali/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

"by the January 15" → "by January 15"
Remove the hyphen between "unusually-high".
Sources are archived.
Images are free-to-use.
Great work.
Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·