Talk:Hurricane Paul (2006)

To do

Needs a copyedit, and a complete track map for B-Class. Titoxd^(?!?) 02:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

But other than that, I think Hink made a good standard article. — Alastor Moody _{(T + C + U)} 01:07, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Upgraded to B Class. Storm05 18:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

No, it still needs the copyedit. – Chacor 06:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh come on, it looks like a standard B class article already; I barely see anything else to fix except for maybe one or two typos. — Alastor Moody _{(T + C + U)} 07:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, what is keeping this from being a B class? It has a track map, and I don't see any spelling errors - at least not enough to keep it from being B class. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, no spelling errors, has a track map, comprehensive, it's a B-class article. Hello32020 02:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

GA pass

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail:

Another great one. -Phoenix 23:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after it passed in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources (there are also a few dead links as well). If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Paul (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002143808/http://www.hotelcondoresort.com/2006/10/26/mexican-resort-third-time-lucky-as-storm-misses/ to http://www.hotelcondoresort.com/2006/10/26/mexican-resort-third-time-lucky-as-storm-misses/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Paul (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061027181628/http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aF0aZWTs7Qbs&refer=latin_america to https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aF0aZWTs7Qbs&refer=latin_america

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)