Talk:Hurricane Waldo

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleHurricane Waldo has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 10, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Todo

edit

Start class due to need of copyedit. Also, the MH should include the post-landfall info that's found in the HPC report. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've done both and upped to C class. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The 928 mb report seems really sketchy, given its winds. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agreed completely, but that's what The MWR said. YE Pacific Hurricane

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Waldo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 17:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 February 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. NeilN talk to me 17:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hurricane Waldo (1985)Hurricane Waldo – Only one Pacific hurricane named Waldo. 219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. SkyWarrior 02:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 27 May 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) — JJMC89(T·C) 01:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hurricane Waldo (1985)Hurricane Waldo – The only Pacific hurricane to be named Waldo, and seriously i'm not an block evader on above. SMB99thx XD (contribs) 12:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Waldo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply