Talk:Hurt (Christina Aguilera song)/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:  (talk · contribs) 15:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit
  • It was written by Aguilera, Linda Perry and Mark Ronson for Aguilera's fifth studio album, Back to Basics (2006). --> add the producer
  Done
  • which was planned to be the second single --> the second one
  Done
  • "Hurt" received positive reviews from music critics who praised Aguilera's voice and its production ---> add a comma after critics
  Done
  • Commercially, it was a worldwide success, peaking within the top ten in Australia, Austria, Belgium and France... ---> Commercially, the single attained moderate success in the US, peaking at number... However, it was a top-ten hit worldwide, peaking...
  Done
  • in several occasions, including a performance at the 2006 MTV Video Music Awards and on her 2006-07 Back to Basics Tour. --> on several occasions, including at the 2006 MTV VMA ...
  Done

Still reviewing — (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Background

edit
  • However, record company RCA Records felt that with the holiday season coming up, it would be safer to release "Hurt", as it would become a big holiday power ballad, comparable to how Aguilera's "Beautiful" performed commercially back in the 2002 holidays. ---> However, the singer's recording label RCA Records felt that with the holiday season coming up, it would be safer to release "Hurt", as it would become a big holiday power ballad, comparable to how Aguilera's "Beautiful" performed commercially back in the 2002 holidays.
  Done

Composition

edit
  • Its slow melody is paced at 72 beats per minute and set in common time ---> ?
  Done
  • Aguilera's voice range spans from G3 to E5 ---> I think "vocals" would be more suitable than "voice"
  Done
  • Eric Gorfain., ---> remove the full stop
  Done
  • The lyrics part is so... lame? (sorry, I don't have any words to describe it) Why are the lyrics sourced by the album notes? You should source them by MetroLyrics or something else?
  Done

Critical reception

edit
  • well received ---> well-received
  Done
  • I don't think the quotebox is required here. Remove it
  Done

Chart performance

edit
  • Add RIAA certification
  Done
  • has sold over 1.1 million digital copies so far ---> I don't think "so far" is needed
  Done
  • a Gold certification 40,000 digital downloads ---> a Gold certification for 40,000 digital downloads
  Done
  • and has spent ---> had spent
  Done
  • year-end chart in 2006, Hurt peaked at number 150 ---> of 2006,... was the 150th best-selling single in the country
  Done
  • has re-entered ---> remove "has"
  Done
  • In Australia, "Hurt" entered the charts ---> chart
  Done
  • The next week ---> The following week
  Done
  • falling out ---> and fell out
  Done
  • spending a total of 27 weeks in the chart ---> on the chart
  Done
  • Belgium and France certifications are based on SALES, not SHIPMENTS, fix it
  Done
  • Add the chart position for Swiss chart
  Done
  • Swiss certification is based on unspecified figures, not shipments, fix it
  Done

Music video

edit
  • due to coldness ---> due to the coldness
  Done
  • the ending instrumental to "Enter the Circus"/"Welcome" ---> of
  Done
  • old fashioned ---> old-fashioned
  Done

Live and covers

edit
  • in her Back to Basics Tour ---> on
  Done

Credits

edit
  • Use n-dash instead of dash
  Done

Release history

edit
  • Add label
  Done

Charts

edit
  • Add !scope="row" for charts information
  Done
  • Sources for charts need accessdate
  Done

Sources

edit
  • Several sources (example: MTV News, Rolling Stone, Billboard...) require brackets in their publisher. (Use {{Cite news}} instead of {{Cite web}})
  Done
  • Reviewing

Status

edit

(talk) 15:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Done all. Jorn talk 15:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Second read through

edit

Lead

edit
  • It was written by Aguilera, Linda Perry and Mark Ronson, and produced by Perry for Aguilera's fifth studio album, Back to Basics (2006). ---> repetition of "Aguilera", try "her", "the latter" or "the singer"
  • It was released as the album's second single on September 19, 2006 by RCA Records instead of "Candyman", which was planned to be the second one. ---> repetition of "it", try "the song" or "the track"
  • Perry developed the first draft of the song while Aguilera rewrote some of the lyrics, and the final version is a tribute to the pair's symbiotic teamwork ---> this is sourced by About.com, which is NOT so reliable
  • Aguilera's voice ---> vocals
  • attained a moderate success ---> success is countable lol?
  • however, it was certified gold by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), having sold more than 1.1 million copies in the country alone, according to Nielsen SoundScan. ---> don't require "however"
  • directed by Floria Sigismondi and Aguilera herself in September 2006. ---> I think Aguilera is just a co-director here
  • It was well-received, ---> reduce the comma

Background

edit
  • On the second disc and her work with Perry on it, Aguilera stated ---> about, not on
  • originated of ---> ?

Sources

edit

Several sources which have problems:

  • FN4: About.com doesn't require brackets in its publisher
  • FN5: What is Mansized? Try to find sources are reliable, like I did on "Candyman (Christina Aguilera song)"
  • FN9: MetroLyrics requires publisher
  • FN18: CBS News requires publisher
  • FN21: IGN requires publisher
  • FN25: cite news
  • FN55: work?
  • FN56: publisher?
  • Sources for charts in "Chart performance" and "Charts" must be as the same.
  • Sources for "Amazon.com" needs publisher as "Amazon Inc"

(talk) 02:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Status

edit
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.