Talk:Hussein Saeed/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Hashima20 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR 18:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The first paragraph of the early life section needs a citation
- "Since then, Iraq was not able to qualify to the World Cup" - this too needs a source
- " Saeed played all the 630 minutes of Iraq's 7 matches" - missing full stop
- " One of the documents even showed him and Al-Badri executing a mission" - remove 'even', sounds informal
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Just a few minor issues to address, but other than this the article is looking great. On hold JAGUAR 18:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- The issues pointed out in the (It is reasonably written well) section are now solved. Hashima20 (talk) 19:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, this looks ready to be promoted now. JAGUAR 19:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Really appreciate it! Hashima20 (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, this looks ready to be promoted now. JAGUAR 19:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)