Talk:Huw Edwards (conductor)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 04:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I just wanted to give you an update to make sure you know that I have not forgotten about this article. I suddenly got much more busy than I had expected to be. I've only reviewed the first few sections, and so far, things look good. I will try to finish my review of this article by tomorrow night or the following morning. Thank you for your patience! --Tea with toast (話) 04:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

No worries! --Another Believer _(Talk) 05:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Final review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well done.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   While not necessary for GA, it would be nice to have an image. I am glad you have the info and quote boxes as that helps to add some visual dimension. If you can't find a free image of the man himself, perhaps you might find an image of an auditorium he has performed in? Just a suggestion.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   It has been a pleasure to review such a well written article! Thank you for your effort in researching it and writing it. --Tea with toast (話) 04:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much for taking the time to offer a review. I appreciate the image suggestion as well. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.