This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Why did you delete the infobox alltogether ? if what you disliked was the use of the wording "king of Armenia". That point is fair, king of armenia is an ambiguous term; satraps and especially the orontids who were quasi-hereditary satraps of Armenia, holding the position until Hellenistic times, behaved as monarchs but were not technically kings.
Your criticism of the numbers however do not hold, those are used in academic research.
Hi. Because he did not rule. It is not even certain he that he had any relation to Armenia: He may have been a satrap (i.e. governor). Nor was he an Orontid. Herodotus is primary source, and Khachatryan is not even WP:RS, so I'm not sure what you mean by academic research. Neither Briant nor Schmitt refers to him as Hydarnes II, nor Orontid, nor king. And those are not the only sources. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:46, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply