Talk:Hymeniacidon kitchingi
Latest comment: 4 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Hymeniacidon kitchingi be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
A fact from Hymeniacidon kitchingi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 September 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a 10 cm3 (0.6 cu in) sponge can filter 22.5 L (5 imp gal; 6 US gal) of water per day? Source: "Les éponges ont un énorme pouvoir de filtration puisqu'on estime qu'une colonie de 10 cm³ peut filtrer 22,5 litres d'eau par jour."
- ALT1:... that a 10 cm3 (0.6 cu in) Hymeniacidon kitchingi sponge can filter 22.5 L (5 imp gal; 6 US gal) of water per day?
- Reviewed: Thomas David Morrison
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 18:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC).
Starting review--Kevmin § 17:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Hi Cwmhiraeth, review follows: article created 30 August, article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; almost entirely sourced from the French DORIS site so no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is mentioned in the article and backed up by the source; hook is interesting; a QPQ has been carried out. No problems here - Dumelow (talk) 17:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry Kevmin, we conflicted. Happy for you to complete this if you like, and I will review another for my QPQ - Dumelow (talk) 17:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: No worries, you have already got a good start going! I will let you complete it. No worries.--Kevmin § 17:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Kevmin, much apprciated - Dumelow (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: No worries, you have already got a good start going! I will let you complete it. No worries.--Kevmin § 17:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)