Talk:Hypochaeris radicata
A fact from Hypochaeris radicata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Catsear Toxicity
editThe article says that catsear is safe for humans but poisonous for horses. Cans someone expand on that?174.6.130.25 (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)BeeCier
Same Plant?
editAre Hypochaeris radicata and Hypochoeris radicata the same plant? They seem to be, yet I don't see anything on this wiki to indicate they're synonyms. Khono (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hypochaeris radicata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923203819/http://golfandsportsturf.com.au/article.asp?ArticleID=45 to http://www.golfandsportsturf.com.au/article.asp?ArticleID=45
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VqJ46atN?url=http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311181041/http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Hypochaeris_radicata.html to http://www.nwcb.wa.gov/weed_info/Written_findings/Hypochaeris_radicata.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hypochaeris radicata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110221204206/http://www.seven.eques.com.au/health-pdf/Stringhalt.pdf to http://www.seven.eques.com.au/health-pdf/Stringhalt.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hypochaeris radicata stalk: solid or hollow
editI took a picture of what I believe is a false dandelion for its forked stalk with multiple flowers, and identify.plantnet.org identifies it as Hypochaeris radicata whose stalk is supposed to be solid. However, when I broke a stalk, I found it to be follow. Could any false dandelion have solid stalks? --Roland (talk) 21:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)