Wikipedia

Talk:I'm Into You

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Requested move 1

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. This request is somewhat moot now that this is a redirect to the album, but in any case "into", being a preposition shorter than 5 letters, should be lower case. See WP:CAPS. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 08:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm Into You (song) → I'm Into You — Would like to move this page to I'm Into You, but I couldn't do it because there is a redirect. Can an admin delete the redirect and move this page? Thank you! Greets, Daniel 749 15:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removed from mainstream radio

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

According to this update, "I'm Into You" has been removed from the April 26 section. Ozurbanmusic (talk) 00:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yep. But still on at Rhythmic tho HERE. Edited accordingly. Thanks for the update.—Iknow23 (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'm Into You → I'm into You – Per WP:CAPS any preposition shorter than 5 letters, should be lower case. "Into" is one of them. ℥nding·start 19:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think its fine the way it is as the name is grammatically incorrect anyway is if it were it would be "I'm in to You." So I think it's meant to be "I'm Into You." Candyo32 01:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Composition titles, it'd be "I'm In to You" as the first word of a compound preposition should be capitalized. As such, I'm tempted to say "I'm Into You" is fine since "Into" acts like a compound preposition ("In to"). Powers T 12:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move?

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago10 comments7 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved per discussion below. Personally, I don't buy the compound preposition argument, but I can't go against a near-consensus to ignore the rule I would usually apply. - GTBacchus(talk) 19:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply


I'm Into You → I'm into You –

MoS regulations should not be used when sources are contradictory. I have not seen any reliable sources calling the song "I'm into You". Adabow (talk · contribs) 20:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
That is a silly use of the MoS. MOS:FOLLOW - otherwise we would still have Right thru Me and Girls Fall like Dominoes. It is not up to us to decide how titles are capitalised, however if there are contradictory sources we should look to the MoS. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose, per MOS:CAPS 'Into' is a compound preposition and thus should remain capitalised as this is a published work and lists it so. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 23:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. I mean, come on, this is the longest and arguably most important word out of the three that go to make up this title. Whyever should it be this one that gets decapitalized? If we are going to apply our rules (and in the case of capitalization, I agree with Adabow that we should only consider our own rules when sources differ), we should do so with a certain amount of intelligence.--Kotniski (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Orphaned references in I'm Into You

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of I'm Into You's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AUS":

  • From I Made It (Cash Money Heroes): "Australia Singles Top 50". Australian Recording Industry Association. (acharts.us). April 5, 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-04.
  • From Forever (Drake song): "ARIA Top 100 Singles – Week Commencing 4th January 2009" (PDF). Australian Recording Industry Association. Pandora Archive. January 4, 2009. Retrieved 2010-01-06.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on I'm Into You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I'm Into You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on I'm Into You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:I%27m_Into_You&oldid=1207685543"