Talk:I'm Your Baby Tonight (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will get on with this right away --K. Peake 09:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Only list new jack swing in the infobox since the other two are influences
• Add the release year of her album of the same name
• "and most European countries it was" → "and most European countries, it was"
• The Billboard 200 part is not relevant enough for the lead, also are you sure that the "not black enough" part is either?

I think it is, it gives background information as to why Houston decided to focus on the black public and record the track

• "she chose to work with" → "Houston chose to work with"
• "produced boyfriend Bobby Brown's 1989 album" → "produced her boyfriend Bobby Brown's 1989 album,"
• Shouldn't the song being one of the last recorded be mentioned?
• "it was generally well-received by most critics," → "the song was generally well-received by music critics,"
• Should "street-oriented" really be in quotes when only one reviewer actually wrote that?
• The #1990s part is not needed
• "it is now considered one" → "it has been considered one"
• "It was also" → "The song was also"
• "successful; in the United States, it become Houston's eight number one on the" → "successful, becoming Houston's eighth number one on the US"
• The Switzerland position is not written out anywhere in the body
• Lowercase the Supremes per MOS:THEMUSIC
• "as tribute to Houston" → "in tribute to Houston" however, this para is too short so try to split the previous one at a different point

 Done

Background

• Img looks good!
• Mention that it is her self-titled second studio album

I believe how I wrote it works fine, since Whitney Houston actually has two self-titled albums: 1985's Whitney Houston and 1987's Whitney, and I don't want to mention the word "Whitney" twice.

• "to debut atop the Billboard 200." → "to debut atop the US Billboard 200."
• "chastised Houston for "playing it safe"," → "chastised how Houston "plays everything safe"," per the source
• Remove capitalization for adult contemporary music
• "but I wasn't"." → if this is a full sentence, then the punctuation should be inside the quote
• "attitude" inspired Houston." → "attitude" inspired the singer."
• Remove the comma after third studio album

 Done

Composition and release

• Audio sample looks good!
• Remove pipe on keyboards
• "Musically, it has been described" → "Musically, "I'm Your Baby Tonight" has been described"
• Black church should not be capitalized unless the source does that, also why is dance piped to dance pop not dance music?
• "unlike her past songs, it doesn't" → "unlike her past songs, the track fails to"
• Wikilink tempo
• Wikilink chord progression
• [6] should solely be at the end of the sentence
• "Breihan held that it's the word" → "Breihan held that it is the word"

 Done

Critical reception

• "received generally positive reviews" → "was met with generally positive reviews"
• "who called it a "sure hit" and" → "who called the song a "sure hit", and"
• "Tom Breihan wrote that, despite its" → "Breihan wrote that, despite the"
• "more and more fun"." → "more and more fun."" per MOS:QUOTE on full sentences
• "is what's required"." → "is what's required."" per above
• "considered it Houston's" → "considered "I'm Your Baby Tonight" Houston's"
• A poll conducted of Rolling Stone readers found the song to be Houston's eighth best, so alter accordingly
• "saying it was a" → "saying the song is a"
• "For BET, it is" → "For BET, the song is"

 Done

Commercial performance

• Img looks good!
• "for shipment of 500,000 copies;" → "for shipments of 500,000 copies in the US;"
• "Houston's eight number one" → "Houston's eighth number one"
• Is "up at the time" really a good way of wording it?
• "In Australia, it entered the" → "In Australia, the song entered the"
• Why is the Switzerland position not mentioned here when it is in the lead?

 Done

Music video, live performances and covers

• Img looks good!
• Shouldn't the choreography sentence read that Adam Shankman was in charge of choreography?
• Lowercase the Supremes per MOS:THEMUSIC
• "candy-colored dresses" and focused" → "candy-colored dresses", and focused"
• "Christina Aguilera and" → "Christina Aguilera, and"
• "On early 1991," → "In early 1991,"
• Mention the year of the Welcome Home special
• "as tribute to Houston." → "as a tribute to Houston."

 Done

Track listings and formats

• Good

Credits and personnel

• Good

Charts

Weekly charts

• Good

Year-end charts

• Each table needs a separate caption

 Done

All-time charts

• See MOS:TABLECAPTION

 Done

Certifications and sales

• Retitle to Certifications

 Done

References

• Copyvio score looks slightly too high at 43.2%; cut down quoting from the Stereogum ref to fix this
• Washington Post → The Washington Post on ref 1 with the wikilink
• New York Times → The New York Times on ref 2 with the wikilink
• Remove or replace ref 4 per WP:SELFPUB
• Cite Google Books as via on refs 7, 11, 55 and 60, only wikilinking on the first instance

Can you please elaborate what you mean?

• Pipe Vulture to Vulture.com on ref 13 per MOS:LINK2SECT
• Remove or replace ref 15 per WP:RSSM
• Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) on ref 16 instead of ref 24
• Cite BET as publisher instead on ref 34
• WP:OVERLINK of Music & Media on ref 53
• Wikilink AllMusic on ref 58
• Pipe ARIA to Australian Recording Industry Association on ref 79
• Fix date formatting for refs 87 and 88

Bibliography

• Good

External links

• Good

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went rather quickly! --K. Peake 12:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I have fixed most of the issues addressed; will be back later to finish the rest. --Christian (talk) 14:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

I have addressed (almost) all the points addressed, I just have some questions I hope you can clear up for me :) @Kyle Peake: --Christian (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Chrishm21 The only things I have left to comment are that you could identify the album as her second self-titled album, I meant to add the via parameter to those refs with Google Books and ref 87 needs date formatting fixed. --K. Peake 10:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: Ref 87 is an embedded template for the certifications, is there a way to change it? My doubt regarding the google books via parameter is, do they go on the Bibliography section? Can you provide an example? --Christian (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Chrishm21 The problem is with the access date, which obviously can be fixed and the bibliography section gives no links to Google Books, so no. --K. Peake 10:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Kyle Peake:, happy new year :D ! I'm still not sure on the google books/via you're mentioning, could you provide an example? I also haven't figured out a way to modifiy an existing template (regarding the certification) :/ --Christian (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Chrishm21: I mean sources like 7 that are on Google Books; add this parameter to them and all you need to do is change the access-date, which can be done for a template since someone obviously set that part in the first place. --K. Peake 09:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: hello! I have modify the certification template; let me know if that is OK--Christian (talk) 23:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

• ✓ Pass now, good job on finally fixing those issues after we went back and forth on them! --K. Peake 11:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)