Talk:ICT Development Index

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Digital Opportunity Index should have its own entry, not just one under ITU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukee3 (talk • contribs)

It had one. It got deleted after a debate. (I voted against, but the clear majority was for merging it with ITU). --Alvestrand 21:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Digital Opportunity Index

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have deleted the sentence: "The ICT Development Index was previously known as the Digital Opportunity Index." The IDI is a new index which came out of a merger of different indices (including DOI), see: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/material/2009/MIS2009_w5.pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1041abc (talk • contribs) 08:48, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Massive Errors

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The tables given for 2017 is massively wrong. It uses the values from "Table 2.4: IDI use sub-index rankings and values, 2017 and 2016" in the given source, when it should use Table 2.2. The numbers are also applied to the wrong countries (eg Denmark tops table 2.4, but the number is applied to South Korea). Since Iceland passed Korea on the index, it will also be differently ordered.

Further, it should be mentioned that the methodology is being updated, and future statistics (IDI 2020) will be incompatible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.34.40.166 (talk) 00:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic