Talk:IGL@

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Anypodetos in topic Merger proposal

Merger proposal

edit

IGLC2 is just one of a large number of genes contained in the IGL@ locus. While the locus as a whole is very notable, the individual genes within this locus are much less so. As far as I can see, there is nothing about the IGLC2 gene that would make this particular gene any more notable than the rest. Hence I suggest that the IGLC2 article be replaced with a redirect to IGL@. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Support. What about the PBB templates, should the merged article contain both of them, or should we drop IGLC2's template altogether (dince we cannot reasonably include all IGLx gene templates)?
IGKC should probably be merged into IGK@ as well. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply