Talk:INS Kursura (S20)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheQ Editor (talk · contribs) 17:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Wow, you should thank your signature for this review. I was just skimming through WP:GAN and your signature caught my eye and I decided to review this one. It looks interesting too. This may take a while as it has been a while since I last reviewed due to a wikibreak. Cheers, TheQ Editor (Talk) 17:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

The Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Notes

Just saying, here's a good site for reviewing articles. You may find it helpful for reviewing articles. It's an automated tip generator here.TheQ Editor (Talk) 23:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Well written

• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 600 metres, use 600 metres. generated from  Done  Not done you forgot to add   to all of them. TheQ Editor (Talk) 23:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC) Can you guide me where else? Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle 04:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

• 533mm. That's the last of them. TheQ Editor (Talk) 14:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done Ah thanks.. ƬheStrikeΣagle 14:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

• In the year 2010 change to in 2010. Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise.  Done
• What is FOCINCWEST? You have to explain all abbreviations beforehand.  Done
• They were tasked to patrol approaches - doesn't flow  Done Tell me if it's good enough now ƬheStrikeΣagle 14:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• to public - change to "to the public"  Done

Referencing

• ref 12 is a dead link
• ref 32 is a dead link
• ref 56 is a dead link

Ref 12 works fine for me...and ref 32 and 56 don't exist! ƬheStrikeΣagle 14:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I looked at Checklinks for the wrong page. I was checking two pages at the same time. So much for multi-tasking. The correct ones are 15 and 18.TheQ Editor (Talk) 23:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)  Done

Broadness

was repaired within months - how long excatly? That we don't know. The author (former rear admiral) doesn't mention the exact time unfortunately.

shifted to a new patrol location - where? We added all we could from public sources...so if it's not available, I guess they want it to remain confidential! ƬheStrikeΣagle 14:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Stability

• no problems

Images

• no problems